Publications

Person in a colorful garment stands near water with a rural house in the background; cover of the "Advancing Disability Inclusive Climate Action" guide featuring logos of CBM Global, IAG, and GDI Hub.

Type

Report
Advancing disability inclusive climate action: A resource guide for global practitioners

CBM Global, IAG, and GDI Hub

This Resource Guide was developed jointly by the Global Disability Innovation Hub (GDI Hub) and the Inclusion Advisory Group (IAG), which is an initiative of CBM Global Disability Inclusion. We would like to acknowledge the contributions of the 15 sector experts who participated in interviews during the initial consultation phase in 2023, offering valuable insights into the challenges and opportunities for inclusion across urban climate action, nature-based solutions, and energy transition

Climate change is the defining challenge of our time. Its impacts are widespread, but they are not experienced equally. Persons with disabilities – who represent over one billion people globally are disproportionately affected by climate-related risks, yet remain underrepresented in climate policy, planning, and action. This Resource Guide is a practical response to that gap. And it brings something new to the field of climate action: a clear, practical focus on how disability inclusion can be embedded across specific climate action sectors. From energy and urban development to nature-based solutions and disaster risk reduction, it showcases real-world examples that demonstrate what is possible when inclusion is intentional. These examples are still too rare and too often undocumented. 

By highlighting them, this guide aims to inspire and equip climate practitioners to act, then document and share those actions to drive learning across sectors. The guide is grounded in dialogue, with organisations of persons with disabilities, climate actors, and development partners, and reflects a growing recognition that inclusive climate action is not only a matter of rights, but of resilience and resourcefulness. This is reflected in the growing momentum for official recognition of a disability constituency with the UNFCCC; a vital step to ensure that persons with disabilities can shape the policies which impact their lives. As organisations committed to disability inclusion and innovation, we see this guide as both a comprehensive resource and a starting point to build more evidence. There is an urgent need for deeper collaboration between disability and climate actors to generate and share knowledge, build mutual understanding, and strengthen inclusive practice. Through partnerships, dialogue, and joint learning, we can ensure that persons with disabilities are not only supported to be resilient to the impacts of climate change, but are active participants in shaping a more just and sustainable future.

Download

Cite

Advancing disability inclusive climate action: A resource guide for global practitioners

Patrick, M., Wardrop, P., Palmer, T., Wali, T. (2025) Advancing disability inclusive climate action: A resource guide for global practitioners working on urban climate action, nature-based solutions, and energy transition. Prepared by the Global Disability Innovation Hub (GDI Hub) and CBM Global Inclusion Advisory Group (IAG).

Advancing disability inclusive climate action: A resource guide for global practitioners

Cover of report

Type

Report
Youth Attitudes Towards Disability Sport & Assistive Technology

The 2024 Paralympic Games present a unique cultural moment to amplify the voices and stories of persons living with disabilities. To leverage this global event, the Global Disability Innovation Hub partnered with Shujaaz, an Emmy award winning partner based in Kenya to create a comprehensive initiative that explores and highlights the cultural impact of disability beyond the realm of sports. As part of this work Shujaaz collected data from Kenyans aged 18-24 across the country to understand:

  • To what extent young Kenyans are aware of, positive about, participating in disabled sports
  • To what extent young Kenyans are aware of, positive about, making use of assistive technology.

Shujaaz Inc; 2025

Download

Abstract

Youth Attitudes Towards Disability Sport & Assistive Technology

Global Disability Innovation Hub (GDI Hub) is an Academic Research and Practice Centre accelerating disability innovation for a more just world.

AT2030 is a UK Aid-funded programme led by the GDI Hub to test ‘what works’ to improve access to life-changing Assistive Technology (AT) for all.

Shujaaz Inc is a network of social ventures working to break down the barriers preventing young people from taking control of the future.

WaCurious* is a Shujaaz Inc brand that mobilises young people with deep local knowledge, trains them on basic research skills and equips them with the necessary tools to collect data and insights to inform positive community change.

Study context:

To build on its efforts in accelerating disability innovation, GDI Hub seeks to understand the attitudes of 18–24-year-old Kenyans on disability, disability sports and assistive technology. AT2030 funded this study.

Study Objective:

  • To understand to what extent young Kenyans are aware of, positive about, participating in disabled sports.
  • To understand to what extent young Kenyans are aware of, positive about and making use of assistive technology.

Methodology & Sampling

WaCurious members conducted face-to-face interviews with 18–24-year-olds (referred to in this presentation as “Contributors”) in their neighbourhoods. WaCurious members were trained on the objectives of the study, research ethics and how to collect data digitally. All data collection was monitored closely by WaCurious research experts. Contributors are from 27 counties across Kenya.

Overview of Study Findings

  • 70% of contributors are interested in sports. Of those interested in sports, 77% are fans, 43% play, while 7% either coach or are organising sports.
  • TV is the leading channel of following sports at 70%, social media is second at 53%. DSTV (a pay-television serving Sub-Saharan Africa) is the most watched TV station (31%) while Radio Jambo is the most listened to radio station (45%) for sports news.
  • Of all social media platforms where contributors follow sports, Facebook is the favourite at 45%).
  • 47% of contributors followed Paris 2024 Olympic Games. 23% followed the Paris 2024 Paralympic Games.
  • 11% of contributors self-identify as disabled. 16% report having a disabled family member, 41% have a disabled friend and 33% have a disabled person attending their school.
  • 45% of contributors have seen a disabled person participating in sport in their community.
  • Athletics (37%), football (31%) and volleyball (12%) are the sports disabled people are seen participating in. These are the same sports (in the same order) contributors say they would like to follow in Paralympics.
  • 96% of contributors respond positively to the idea of having a disabled teammate, opponent or coach
  • 42% of contributors report that they are using one form of assistive technology.
  • 72% can describe assistive technology correctly as per the WHO definition.
  • 26% think they need assistive technology now, while 40% think they will need it in the future.
  • Most contributors (86%) are willing to participate in sports with someone using glasses as assistive technology. Willingness to participate with someone using a wheelchair is at 62% and is the least scoring of all the assistive technologies listed.
  • The chances of people using assistive technology achieving things in life are rated at: 64% for completing secondary school; 64% for having own family; 63% for getting a college degree and 44% for participating in sports.
  • Discrimination, stigma and lack of facilities account for 74% of all reported challenges.
  • 92% of all contributors feel it is important for disabled athletes to be supported to participate in professional-level sports. The identified support includes financial support (29%), assistive technology (27%) psychological support (12%) and creation of opportunities (12%) among others.

Youth Attitudes Towards Disability Sport & Assistive Technology

Type

Report
Inclusive Cities

The Global Disability Innovation Hub

The Inclusive Infrastructure sub-programme, led by GDI Hub, recognises that the built environment, the world where we live, dictates our ability to use the AT we need. Access to the built environment is a fundamental human right, protected by the UN CRPD. However, the world we have designed and built presents a multitude of barriers and challenges for many, including persons with disabilities.

Global Disability Innovation Hub; 2024

Download Visit publisher

Abstract

Inclusive Cities

The aim of this report is to equip cities with practical but evidence-based actions to accelerate accessibility and inclusion in their physical infrastructure, buildings, services and operations.

Cities worldwide are experiencing continued growth and increasing resource challenges. This is particularly challenging in low- and middle-income settings, where huge infrastructural development is often necessary. With resource constraints and growing global challenges (rising inequality, climate changes, pandemics), it is even more critical that accessibility and inclusive design are seamlessly integrated into the planning and design of cities and all their functions, to ensure the effective and resilient use of resources to create liveable and enjoyable cities and provide persons with disabilities are not left behind.

National governments generally set disability policy, while cities need locally adaptable and practical frameworks for inclusive action. This suggests a need for a global agenda of inclusive practices for cities to catalyse shared learning and collective efforts, not reinvent the wheel, and help cities create an inclusive city.

Outputs​​​​

All reports can be downloaded as a PDF. In addition to the Global Action Report and Global Comparison reports, each city case study report is also available to download here. ​

City Case Study Reports:

  1. Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia
  2. Varanasi, India
  3. Surakarta, Indonesia
  4. Nairobi, Kenya​
  5. Freetown, Sierra Leone
  6. Medellin, Colombia

Inclusive Cities

Type

Report
Integrating Disability in Energy Transition GESI Strategies

Mikaela Patrick,Pollyanna Wardrop,Bala Nagendran Marimuthu

Disability is diverse, encompassing physical, sensory, and intellectual disabilities. Likewise, the experiences of people with disabilities—and the barriers they encounter when trying to access or benefit from material, financial, or social opportunities—vary greatly. Just as diverse are the ways in which these barriers can be removed. Hence, an explicit focus on disability is key to delivering an inclusive energy transition that leaves no one behind.

This Briefing Note sets the context, rationale, and recommendations for strategically integrating disability inclusion and accessibility in energy transition, Gender Equality, and Social Inclusion (GESI) programming and delivery. Particularly, this frames a Gender Equality, Disability, and Social Inclusion (GEDSI) approach for the Transforming Energy Access (TEA) platform and partners and presents eleven recommendations for action.

Transforming Energy Access

Integrating Disability in Energy Transition GESI Strategies

Type

Report
Opportunities for Disability-inclusive Energy Access

Mikaela Patrick,Pollyanna Wardrop,Bala Nagendran Marimuthu

Globally, 1 in 6 people experience disability (16%), 80% of whom live in Low- and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs). Disability occurs when people with impairments lose the opportunity for equal participation in society because of social and environmental barriers. In the context of climate change, disability can be a cause and consequence of energy poverty, as households of people with disabilities in LMICs are commonly larger, poorer, and in rural areas, where they may require more heating or cooling.

This White Paper titled ‘Opportunities for Disability-inclusive Energy Access’ underscores the need for inclusive energy transition measures to prevent socio-economic exclusion and discrimination, particularly among people with disabilities. This also outlines opportunities for powering assistive technology with clean energy and creating accessible clean energy solutions across eight sectors, including 1) home appliances and information and communication technologies (ICTs); 2) built environment and cities; 3) transportation; 4) healthcare; 5) education; 6) green jobs; 7) humanitarian sector and reconstruction; and 8) energy infrastructure.

This will serve as a reference for energy access innovators, practitioners, and policymakers to identify potential entry points for their contribution to disability-inclusive energy transition.

Transforming Energy Access

Opportunities for Disability-inclusive Energy Access

screenshot of article's first page
Demographic, socioeconomic, and social barriers to use of mobility assistive products: a multistate analysis of the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing

Assistive technology, such as canes, walkers, and wheelchairs, is essential for independence and social participation for people with disabilities. However, access remains limited, even in high-income countries. For example, over 30% of people with disabilities in England have unmet needs for assistive devices.

Factors like age, gender, location, and socioeconomic status influence access to assistive technology. While much research focuses on devices like glasses and hearing aids, mobility aids (e.g., wheelchairs) often receive less attention despite growing demand. Understanding these access disparities is crucial for identifying the groups most in need of support and guiding better policies.

Long-term data on assistive technology use is limited, but by combining data on disability and device use, we can identify gaps in access—especially for individuals who may not identify as disabled but still face significant functional limitations. Examining the links between demographic, social, and economic factors with unmet needs can help improve access and ensure more inclusive support for those most need it.

The Lancet; 2024

Download Visit publisher

Abstract

Demographic, socioeconomic, and social barriers to use of mobility assistive products: a multistate analysis of the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing

Background

Cross-sectional evidence suggests that access to essential mobility assistive products (MAPs) might be dependent on non-clinical factors. However, MAP use is better understood as a dynamic process wherein individuals pass through different states of MAP need and use. We aimed to test associations of demographic, socioeconomic, and social factors with transitions between MAP need and use states.

Methods

For this multistate modelling study, data were drawn from 13 years (May, 2006, to July, 2019) of the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing, a prospective cohort study. We included respondents aged 50–89 years who participated in at least two waves of data collection. We used multistate models to examine associations of demographic, socioeconomic, and social factors, including age, sex, education, employment, wealth, marital status, and help with activities of daily living (ADL), with transitions between three main states: no need for MAPs, unmet need for MAPs, and use of MAPs.

Findings

We used data collected from 12 080 respondents (6586 women and 5494 men). During follow-up, 5102 (42·2%) of participants had unmet MAP need and 3330 (27·6%) used MAPs. Women were more likely than men to transition from no need to unmet need (hazard ratio [HR] 1·49, 95% CI 1·38–1·60) and less likely to transition from unmet need to use (0·79, 0·72–0·86). We found an increase in risk of transitioning from no need to unmet need for each 1-year increase in age (1·06, 1·06–1·07), for those with low education level (1·34, 1·23–1·45), those with help with ADL (1·32, 1·16–1·49), and who were not employed (1·22, 1·07–1·40) or disabled (3·83, 2·98–4·93). Similarly, we found an increase in risk of transitioning unmet need to use for each 1-year increase in age (1·06, 1·05–1·06), for those with low education level (1·20, 1·10–1·31), and those with help with ADL (1·25, 1·13–1·38). Increasing wealth was associated with a reduced risk of transitioning from no need to unmet need (0·78, 0·74–0·81) and from unmet need to use (0·94, 0·89–0·99). Single people were more likely to transition from unmet need to use than partnered people (HR 1·21, 95% CI 1·10–1·33).

Interpretation

Women might be disproportionately likely to have unmet MAP needs, whereas other demographic, socioeconomic, and social factors are associated with high MAP need overall. Our findings directly support efforts towards expanding access to assistive products and identifying groups that could particularly benefit. As the first study of its kind to our knowledge, replication with other longitudinal datasets is needed.

Funding

UK Aid.

Demographic, socioeconomic, and social barriers to use of mobility assistive products: a multistate analysis of the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing